Social media

Social Media

It’s not neutral: social media companies are trying hard to get your attention.
(779 words)
IELTS Reading Questions:
Yes / No / Not Given & List Selection

Some years ago, I was travelling on the underground in Taiwan, and a woman opposite me was messaging someone on her phone. At the next stop her friend got on, and they seemed really excited to see each other. They talked for about 30 seconds, and then something strange but increasingly normal happened: the excitement and conversation just died, and after a short pause, their heads fell forward, and they looked down at their phones and began that familiar robotic action of flicking up their screens with their index fingers. It was like someone had turned off their aliveness switches.

I find the sight of so many people glued to their phones quite depressing – people walking down the street with their heads down, young couples in restaurants staring at their screens, kids trying to get attention from a mum who’s not looking up. I’m not sure why it bothers me so much, but there is something sad about the amount of distraction that is happening, and how that distraction seems to be taking people further away from experiencing more fulfilling face-to-face interactions. It also seems that many people don’t realise that it’s happening or that they have been manipulated by very clever algorithms.

Much of this technology is not neutral: most social media apps and websites are competing for your attention, and for many of the big companies this is driven by the advertising model – the more time you spend on site, the more revenue the company gets from advertisers. In a 2017 TED talk, Tristan Harris, who studied how to manipulate people’s thoughts while working at Google, explained how engineers at these tech companies are looking into how your psychology works to figure out the best ways to get your attention. He claimed that these companies steer 1 billion thoughts, as any notification on your screen leads you to have thoughts that you didn’t intend to have.

As well as the amount of distraction and wasted time this leads to, one problem with this competition for your attention is the type of thoughts these companies might lead you to have. News sources have known for a long time that stories that shock or make people angry or scared get more viewers or readers, so they have tended to show these stories more. And Harris says that in the online world, outrage is very good at getting people’s attention – stories that make people feel outraged are the ones that they tend to engage with and share more, which means the clever algorithms will show you more of those stories as it increases time on site. Think for a moment about what that does to your view of the world, and the things that you spend time reading, thinking about, and talking about. Harris believes this is “changing our ability to have the conversations and relationships that we want with each other.”

Social media is great for keeping in touch with people, but I have noticed that when I post a photo on Facebook, it’s quite unsettling to see how my behaviour changes: likes start popping up, and it feels good. Then I find myself compulsively checking to see if there are more likes, and more comments, as the good feeling changes to one of wanting more: ’20 likes; I hope it gets to 30’, my thinking goes, as if I will feel okay then, and I continue checking who has liked it and who hasn’t.

That compulsive checking and wanting more is a common experience, and again, it’s because the technology involved here is not neutral: Facebook have designed their likes system to make you want to keep checking. In an article in the Guardian, Sean Parker, founding president of Facebook, admitted that Facebook engineers designed this system to give you a little hit of dopamine when somebody comments on or likes your picture or post. Dopamine is a feel-good neurotransmitter connected to happiness, motivation and desire. And each time you get a like, dopamine not only gives you a little bit of pleasure, but also drives you to get more.

Social media has brought a lot of benefits, but the amount of distraction and the effect on people’s ability to connect is worrying. This, along with the way that we are targeted with news stories, and even lies, leads Harris to say that he doesn’t know of a more urgent problem right now.

I hope there will be changes, tech companies designing more ethical systems perhaps, or maybe some kind of waking up, as people become more aware of how they’re being manipulated and realise they have more of a choice about what they pay attention to.

IELTS Reading Questions for Social Media:
Yes / No / Not Given & List Selection.

Sources and links from Social Media

TED talk by Tristan Harris about what tech companies are doing to get your attention.
Guardian article about social media and dopamine.
– Image by Анастасия Гепп from Pixabay 

Share here

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest

Follow me here

This Post Has 8 Comments

  1. Rawia

    Thanks Nick, question number 5 was a bit tricky but it’s really helpful and worth looking.

    1. Nick

      You’re welcome, Rawia.
      Yeah, 5 is tricky – the relevant information is in the final paragraph.

      1. Masroor

        Hi Nick, the final paragraph doesn’t address anything about help. It just mentioned about people waking up. So how have we come to a conclusion that the answer of question 5 is no?

        1. Nick

          Hi Masroor.
          It’s the final part, after ‘waking up’
          – ‘people become more aware of how they’re being manipulated (by tech companies)…’ = more knowledge
          – ‘realise they have more of a choice’ = a good thing for them (helpful)
          together = more knowledge about what tech companies are doing IS helpful for people.

  2. Jim

    Hi Nick, could you please explain to me why is question number 1’s answer is YES? TIA.

  3. Jim

    Also, why is question number 2 “NG” instead of NO? Thanks

    1. Nick

      Hi Jim.

      1. Look at paragraph 2 towards the end: ‘and how that distraction (the distraction caused by samrtphones) seems to be taking people further away from experiencing more fulfilling face-to-face interactions.’ This suggests that the writer thinks people get more satisfaction from face-to-face interactions than online ones, so Y.
      2. The key word is most (look out for words like that in T/F/NG and Y/N/NG questions). Paragraph 3 explains how tech companies get money from the advertising model and the effect that this has; however, it doesn’t say, or even suggest, that they get most of their money from from advertising. It might be true in the real world that these companies do get most of their money from advertising, but the article just doesn’t say that, so NG.

  4. Anes

    It’s kinda weirdly true about myself I used to be more into social networking sites
    But now I have learned to check it
    I also used to get excited when people likes my post specially for when people says something good about my post I used to feel good besides when people does bad comments I used to feel bad
    Now I don’t react that much to that

Leave a Reply

If you liked this, you might like these:

In a rush

In a rush

In a rush? What is the worst that can happen if you slow down?
(574 words)
IELTS Reading Questions:
Summary Completion and True / False / Not Given

Read More »


Our well-being is connected to our sense of belonging.
(782 words)
IELTS Reading Questions:
Short Answer & Yes / No / Not Given

Read More »


Fairness is important to humans and some animals, but why do we have such strong feelings when things are not fair?
(780 words)
IELTS Reading Questions:
Matching Information and Sentence Completion

Read More »

6 Ways People Influence You

People who know how your thinking works can use that knowledge to influence the decisions you make.
(645 words)
IELTS Reading Questions:
Matching Headings and True / False / Not Given

Read More »